Carbon and GHG Accounting and Management
Carbon data is now requested by regulators, lenders, investors, customers and national net-zero programmes, and figures that cannot be traced or verified create real financial and reputational risk. This programme gives managers the method to build a reliable greenhouse gas inventory, prepare it for verification and disclosure, and turn it into a credible reduction plan.
Many organisations have produced a carbon footprint, but few can defend it. Boundaries are set inconsistently, emission factors come from unclear sources, Scope 3 is estimated from spend data without a plan to improve it, and spreadsheets have no controls. When a lender, customer or verifier asks how a figure was calculated, the answer is hard to find. Targets are then announced before the baseline is stable, and reduction plans are not linked to capital budgets or operational decisions.
This programme treats carbon accounting as a management system, not a one-off calculation. It moves through five stages: understanding climate science, policy and business drivers; setting boundaries and building the Scope 1 and Scope 2 inventory; addressing Scope 3 and data quality; preparing for verification and disclosure; and setting targets and managing reductions.
Built on recognised practice. The programme references the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard, Scope 2 Guidance and Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard, ISO 14064-1 for organisational inventories and ISO 14064-3 for validation and verification, ISO 14068-1 on carbon neutrality, IFRS S2 climate-related disclosures, and the Science Based Targets initiative. It also explains the ongoing revision of the GHG Protocol standards and the partnership between the GHG Protocol and ISO, so that participants can prepare for change.
Decisions this programme improves. Which consolidation approach and boundaries to adopt; which emission factors and data sources to use; where to invest in better Scope 3 data; what level of verification to seek; how to set a base year and when to recalculate it; which reduction measures to fund first using marginal abatement cost thinking; and when, if at all, to use carbon credits.
How it is delivered. Twenty hours across five sessions, built around one running case: a multi-site organisation preparing its first verified inventory and a reduction target at the request of a lender and a major customer. Participants set boundaries, calculate Scope 1 and 2 emissions, screen Scope 3 categories, review a verifier's findings and build a reduction plan using spreadsheet models.
In-house option. For organisations, the programme can be tailored to your own sites, data systems, reporting obligations and net-zero commitments, and delivered for sustainability, energy, finance and operations teams together so that everyone works from the same numbers.
Who Should Attend
Objectives
Course Outline
Competencies
Live Online
Related Topics
Many organisations publish sustainability reports and ESG ratings, yet their strategy, capital plans and incentives remain unchanged. Investors, lenders, regulators and customers increasingly notice the gap. This programme helps managers turn ESG from a reporting exercise into a strategy: choosing the issues that matter, setting credible targets, funding delivery and disclosing progress that stands up to scrutiny.
Environmental permits, impact assessments and public health decisions depend on monitoring data and models, yet poorly designed networks, weak quality control and misused models often produce results that regulators and communities cannot trust. This programme gives environmental specialists the methods to design monitoring programmes, assure data quality, apply models correctly and turn results into defensible decisions.
Leaders are now judged on how results are achieved, not only on the results: stakeholders expect sound ethics, attention to people and the environment, and decisions that still make sense in ten years. This programme gives managers and senior leaders practical tools to set long-term direction, make responsible trade-offs, lead change and account for their impact.
