Contract Management Using Quality Assurance Methodology
When quality requirements are vague in the contract, the owner pays for rework, disputes over acceptance and late delivery. This programme shows contract and quality professionals how to build quality assurance into every stage of a contract, from specifications and quality plans to inspection, non-conformance, variations and claims, so that what is delivered matches what was bought.
Contracts often state that work must be "to the required standard" without defining the standard, the evidence of conformity or the consequence of failure. Quality plans are submitted but not reviewed, inspections are informal, non-conformances are closed without root cause, and design reviews are treated as a formality. When defects appear, the parties argue over whether they are defects, variations or claims, and the owner's bargaining position has already gone with the payment.
This programme applies quality assurance thinking to the whole contract life cycle. It moves through five stages: writing quality into requirements and contracts, evaluating suppliers and awarding on capability, reviewing designs and quality plans, controlling conformity during delivery, and handling variations, claims and close-out using quality evidence.
Built on recognised practice. The programme references ISO 9001 quality management system requirements, ISO 10005 guidelines for quality plans, ISO 10006 guidance on quality management in projects, ISO 19011 for auditing, and the quality, testing, defects and variation provisions of the FIDIC 2017 contracts. The PDCA cycle and basic quality tools are used throughout.
Decisions this programme improves. What quality requirements and acceptance criteria to write into a contract; whether a supplier's quality system is adequate; whether to approve a design or a quality plan; how to treat a non-conformance; and whether a request for more time or money is a genuine variation or a consequence of poor quality.
How it is delivered. Twenty hours across five sessions, built around one running case: a supply and installation contract for plant or building systems. Participants draft acceptance criteria, review a supplier quality plan, plan a supplier audit, process a non-conformance and evaluate a delay and cost claim against quality records.
In-house option. For organisations, the programme can be tailored to your own contract forms, quality management system procedures and supplier evaluation criteria, and delivered to contracts, procurement and quality teams together.
Who Should Attend
Objectives
Course Outline
Competencies
Roma
Related Topics
Contracts rarely fail at signature. They fail in administration: obligations nobody tracked, notices sent late, changes agreed informally and records that cannot support a position. This programme gives contract practitioners a disciplined method to manage obligations, control change, handle claims and disputes, and close contracts cleanly with the commercial position protected.
Claims and disputes are expensive because they are usually prepared too late, with weak records and a poor reading of the contract. This programme gives practitioners a structured approach to preventing, preparing, assessing and resolving contractual claims, from notices and time bars to negotiation, dispute boards, mediation and arbitration.
Poor quality in IT shows up late and costs most: defects found in production, services that miss their levels and projects delivered without meeting user needs. This programme gives IT practitioners a practical quality management approach covering software and service quality, testing, process improvement and measurement across the whole IT life cycle.
