Green Building Rating Systems: Estidama, Mostadam and LEED
Green building targets are now written into planning approvals, tenders and investor requirements across the Gulf, yet many projects treat rating credits as paperwork added late in design, which raises cost and risks a lower rating. This programme gives project teams a practical understanding of Estidama, Mostadam and LEED, and how to plan, deliver and document credits efficiently.
Projects often lose rating points and money for avoidable reasons. The target rating is set without checking which credits suit the site, climate and budget. Energy and water strategies are decided before the rating requirements are understood. Contractors are not told what evidence they must collect, and submittals are assembled at the end from incomplete records. Teams working across the UAE and Saudi Arabia, or on international-brand projects, must also manage different systems with different logic and documentation.
This programme compares the three systems and then follows a project through their shared stages. It moves through five areas: how each rating system is structured and administered, integrated design strategies for energy and water in a hot, arid climate, materials, indoor environment and site credits, construction-phase compliance and documentation, and operations, performance verification and the business case.
Built on recognised practice. The programme references the Estidama Pearl Rating System used in Abu Dhabi, Mostadam, Saudi Arabia's green building rating system, and LEED from the U.S. Green Building Council, including the move from LEED v4 and v4.1 to LEED v5. It also refers to supporting standards commonly cited by these systems, such as ASHRAE 90.1 for energy performance and ASHRAE 62.1 for ventilation, and to whole-life carbon and life-cycle assessment principles.
Decisions this programme improves. Which rating system and target level fit the project and the client's obligations; which credits to pursue and which to drop; when design decisions must be made to secure credits; how to assign credit responsibilities across the design and construction team; and how to judge whether a green feature adds value over the building's life.
How it is delivered. Twenty hours across five sessions, built around one running case: a mixed-use development that must meet an Estidama Pearl requirement for one plot, a Mostadam target for a Saudi project and a LEED target requested by an international tenant. Participants build a credit strategy, a responsibility matrix and a documentation plan, and compare the three systems side by side.
In-house option. For organisations, the programme can be tailored to your own project portfolio, the rating systems you use most and your design and construction procedures, and delivered for design, project management and facilities teams together.
Who Should Attend
Objectives
Course Outline
Competencies
Cairo
Related Topics
Water leaks, air leakage, condensation and failed sealants are among the most common and costly defects in new buildings, and they are usually found only after handover. This programme gives engineers, inspectors and facility teams a practical method to inspect the building envelope, plan and witness field tests, interpret results and close out defects before they become claims.
Construction decisions are often made on technical reports that are hard to read, weakly evidenced or answer a different question from the one being asked. This programme gives engineers, project managers and client representatives a structured method to evaluate technical reports critically and to write reports that lead decision makers to a clear, defensible conclusion.
Many buildings and infrastructure assets start their operating life with missing records, systems that are hard to maintain and costs nobody planned for, because facilities management was not involved during design and construction. This programme shows how to bring FM thinking into projects early, manage handover properly and set up the asset for efficient, safe operation.
