Laboratory Technical Management to ISO/IEC 17025
A laboratory can hold accreditation and still issue results it cannot fully defend, because method validation, measurement uncertainty, traceability and result monitoring are treated as documents rather than technical controls. This programme gives technical and quality managers a practical way to manage the technical requirements of ISO/IEC 17025 and to run a laboratory whose results are valid and trusted.
Most difficulties in ISO/IEC 17025 laboratories are technical, not administrative. Methods are verified once and never revisited, uncertainty budgets omit the largest contributors, calibration intervals are set by habit, proficiency testing results are filed rather than analysed, and decision rules for statements of conformity are not agreed with customers. Technical managers are often promoted specialists who have not been shown how to manage these risks across a whole laboratory.
This programme looks at the laboratory through the eyes of the person responsible for the validity of its results. It moves from the structure and risk-based logic of the standard and the roles of technical and quality management, through competence, equipment and traceability, method selection and validation, measurement uncertainty and decision rules, to assuring the validity of results and using data to improve.
Built on recognised practice. The programme references ISO/IEC 17025:2017, ILAC policies on metrological traceability and on measurement uncertainty in testing, the ILAC G8 guidelines on decision rules and statements of conformity, the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (JCGM 100), the International Vocabulary of Metrology (VIM), Eurachem guidance on method validation and measurement uncertainty, and ISO/IEC 17043 for proficiency testing. Participants apply them to real laboratory situations.
Decisions this programme improves. Whether a method is fit for its intended use; how much validation or verification is enough; which uncertainty contributions matter; how calibration intervals should be set; which decision rule to agree with a customer; how to respond to an unsatisfactory proficiency test result; and when nonconforming work should stop reporting.
How it is delivered. Twenty hours across five sessions, built around one running case: a testing laboratory preparing to extend its scope with a new method. Participants plan the validation, build a simple uncertainty budget in a spreadsheet, set a decision rule, review quality control and proficiency data, and handle a nonconforming result.
In-house option. For organisations, the programme can use your own methods, uncertainty budgets, quality control data and recent assessment findings, and can be delivered to technical and quality staff together.
Who Should Attend
Objectives
Course Outline
Competencies
Roma
Related Topics
Defects in buildings are expensive to fix and damaging to reputation, yet most are designed in or built in long before handover. This programme gives quality leaders on owner, consultant and contractor teams a practical system to plan, inspect, test, record and close out quality on building projects, from quality plan to handover.
A laboratory assessment is only as good as the assessor's ability to test technical competence, not just the presence of procedures. Weak assessments miss invalid results and frustrate good laboratories. This programme gives experienced laboratory professionals the skills to plan, lead and report ISO/IEC 17025 assessments, including the technical areas where most risk sits.
Process redesign often fails not because the new process is wrong, but because people keep working the old way, systems are not aligned, and no one owns the benefits. This programme gives managers an integrated approach to redesigning business processes and leading the people side of change, so that improvements are adopted, sustained and deliver measurable results.
